Sales Management 2.0

Ben Bradley

How we stopped writing big marketing plans and instead learned to use emergent strategies to find new customers

You’ve probably heard this statement a hundred times: "no battle plan survives contact with the enemy." Likewise, no marketing and sales plan ever survives first contact with the market.

We’re all guilty. We plan big. The plan doesn’t survive contact with the customer. Somehow we get busy with billable work. We stop planning.

I don’t have an MBA but even I know that failure to plan is not a good idea.

That’s why we now do only emergent strategy planning for our sales and marketing clients.

An emergent strategy emphasizes the benefits of letting the strategy emerge as assumptions and knowledge gradually becoming apparent through contact with the customer.

Emergent new business strategies are a “try before you commit big budget” approach where strategy is an ongoing process of constant learning, experimentation and risk-taking.

We all have experienced the sales and marketing process in professional services firms. Simply finding an excuse to get in the door is often an opportunistic, adaptive, incremental and complex learning process. But it is important to be very clear - the fact that an emergent strategy is opportunistic does not mean the approach is completely ad-hoc.

Letting strategy emerge through customer interaction provides the environment to learn and evolve the strategy based on real customer requirements.

In most firms, marketing and sales strategies are constantly evolving. Strategies are dynamic rather than static. In order to survive contact with the fickle customer, the marketing strategy must evolve. The evolution must be rapid and inexpensive. If the new business campaign does not change quickly enough or spends too much money too quickly, the objectives of the plan will never be validated. In terms of organizational flexibility, organizations that keep their options open do so by not committing overwhelming budget to actions and investment.

In the early stages of business development, new product roll-outs, new business models and new ventures, we go to market with a number of guesses and very few facts about the desires and needs of the customers in that market.

As we sell, we fail, sometimes succeed, fail some more. But most important, we learn what works and what doesn't. By rapidly repeating this fail, succeed, learn loop, we increase our "knowledge to assumptions" ratio rapidly and hone in on actual customer requirements.

As we learn, we modify the plan quickly before too much cash is spent. This approach is entrepreneurial and the success of web 2.0 properties demonstrates that the best way to figure out what customers want is to put something in front of customers quickly and adapt based on their feedback.

Business owners trained as traditional product marketers, engineers, software architects and other linear thinkers have an automatic bias to define a plan and pursue a strategy. In traditional projects where there are few unknowns, and markets are clearly defined, this approach makes sense.

But when little is known about the needs or wants of the market, a linear approach does not make sense.

Rapid, small and highly iterative campaigns help you develop a marketing and sales strategy that speaks directly to customers.

Learning and research comes from both the execution and the measurement of simple campaigns iterations. At the end of each iteration, campaign modifications are made and the process is repeated.

Like agile software development, the goal for each marketing or sales campaign is to create something to which a customer can react. It should offer a sampling of the key benefits and provide a solution that is simple enough to understand and act upon immediately. To keep a record of the iteration process, keep a project diary with a record of all changes that are performed to various campaigns as they evolve. Update the diary constantly.

Obviously, the goal for every marketing and sales campaign is success. The analysis of every campaign iteration is grounded in customer feedback (success, click-throughs, or even failure).

Simple marketing campaigns (experiments) can be executed and measured quickly. Simple projects always take less time to finish than complex projects. The goal of this approach is to do the simplest thing possible….and nothing more. Before you waste a lot more time on brochures and massive rebranding efforts, try simple campaigns that improve your assumption to knowledge ratio.

Comment

You need to be a member of Sales Management 2.0 to add comments!

Join Sales Management 2.0

Latest Activity

Paul, Ana Bell and sayed raslan joined Sales Management 2.0
2 hours ago
Jose M Barrera is now a member of Sales Management 2.0
yesterday
Eric Gilroy added a discussion
I've gotten a lot of questions lately about Hunters vs Farmers, so I decided to write an article on the differences, as well as how to organize a sales force to support these two distinct roles.    I'd love to get some feedback from the group on w…
on Tuesday
Tom Schulte is now a member of Sales Management 2.0
on Tuesday
Ralph Burns added a blog post
As effective as Masterful Praisings are in reinforcing good behavior, reprimands are as effective at curtailing bad behavior. We call em, you guessed it…”Masterful Reprimands”. Although they are basically concept, just on opposite ends of the spectr…
on Monday
Peter Michie added 3 blog posts
on Saturday
Trevor Usken added a discussion
In our most recent VoIP study, 13% of buyers were replacement buyers (i.e. replacing a VoIP system). While these buyers bring experience with the technology to the table, they have often been burned in the past with faulty or unreliable systems. How…
on Saturday
Robert Pagliarini added a blog post
Greed is Good: Why You Need to Tap Into Your Inner Gordon Gekko Greed is good. Embrace it. Love it. Live it. In fact, greed may be the one thing that can save us. Don’t believe me? Greed was the foundation for this country. The brave souls who riske…
March 5
Charles saba el ghobri is now a member of Sales Management 2.0
March 5
Rajabu Farijala Rajabu, Mustafa Abdelhady, Ilan Kieselstein and 2 more joined Sales Management 2.0
March 4
Trish, I am 100% on board with what you just said... I think the key is really understanding what Skip means when he says hard sell. To me there is a big difference between asking for business and giving a high pressure sales pitch. To me it's kind…
March 3
Hard sell to me means "What will it take to get you into this car today?" kind of language. Not sure that works anymore but at the same time I don't believe being aggressive is a negative. I just won a large deal over a competitor and when I asked w…
March 3
Skip, It is not a style I would personally use or advocate. I don't think customers in general like to be pressured into a sale and I think it is bad for overall reputation and repeat sales. However, I can also say I have seen it work, but just bec…
March 3
Trevor Usken added a discussion
What types of metrics should be included in these goals?We have a Focus Community member that is looking for some help with this - any insight? http://www.focus.com/questions/sales/where-can-find-good-breakdown-b2b-software-sales-performance/?tfso=3
March 2
Skip Anderson added a discussion
Does the hardsell still work in this day and age? Do customers buy from aggressive salespeople? Is it a viable sales strategy? What's the price of using hard selling tactics?
March 2
stephen craine added a video
February 28

© 2010   Created by Brad Trnavsky on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!